Edmonds' Branching Theorem in Digraphs Without Forward-Infinite Paths

نویسنده

  • Attila Joó
چکیده

Let D be a finite digraph, and let V0, . . . , Vk−1 be nonempty subsets of V (D). The (strong form of) Edmonds’ branching theorem states that there are pairwise edge-disjoint spanning branchings B0, . . . ,Bk−1 in D such that the root set of Bi is Vi (i = 0, . . . , k − 1) if and only if for all ∅ 6= X ⊆ V (D) the number of ingoing edges of X is greater than or equal to the number of sets Vi disjoint from X. As was shown by R. Aharoni and C. Thomassen in [1], this theorem does not remain true for infinite digraphs. Thomassen also proved that for the class of digraphs without backward-infinite paths, the above theorem of Edmonds remains true. Our main result is that for digraphs without forward-infinite paths, Edmonds’ branching theorem remains true as well. 1 Notions and notation The digraphs D = (V,A) considered here may have multiple edges and arbitrary size. Loops are also allowed but are irrelevant to our subject. If B ⊆ V , then we write D[B] for the subgraph of D spanned by B. For X ⊆ V let inD(X) and outD(X) be the set of ingoing and outgoing edges respectively of X in D, and let ̺D(X), δD(X) be their respective cardinalities. By a path, we mean a directed, possibly infinite, simple path (the repetition of vertices is not allowed). We denote by start(P ) and end(P ) the first and last vertex of the path P , if they exist. For an edge e from x to y, let start(e) = x and end(e) = y. For X,Y ⊆ V , let eD(X,Y ) = {e ∈ A : start(e) ∈ X, end(e) ∈ Y }; for singletons we write e(x, y) instead of e({x}, {y}). We say that the path P goes from X to Y if V (P ) ∩ X = {start(P )} and V (P ) ∩ Y = {end(P )} (start(P ) = end(P ) is allowed). We call min{̺D(X) : ∅ 6= X ⊆ V \ {r}} the edge-connectivity of D from r, and D is κ-edge-connected from r if this cardinal is at least κ. A digraph is an arborescence with root vertex r if it is a directed tree such that all vertices are reachable from r. A digraph is a branching with root set W if its weakly connected components are arborescences and the vertex set W consists of the roots of these arborescences. B is a k-branching ∗MTA-ELTE Egerváry Research Group, Department of Operations Research, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected].

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Disjoint paths in arborescences

An arborescence in a digraph is a tree directed away from its root. A classical theorem of Edmonds characterizes which digraphs have λ arc-disjoint arborescences rooted at r. A similar theorem of Menger guarantees λ strongly arc disjoint rv-paths for every vertex v, where “strongly” means no two paths contain a pair of symmetric arcs. We prove that if a directed graph D contains two arc-disjoin...

متن کامل

The b-branching problem in digraphs

In this paper, we introduce the concept of b-branchings in digraphs, which is a generalization of branchings serving as a counterpart of b-matchings. Here b is a positive integer vector on the vertex set of a digraph, and a b-branching is defined as a common independent set of two matroids defined by b: an arc set is a b-branching if it has at most b(v) arcs sharing the terminal vertex v, and i...

متن کامل

Independent and maximal branching packing in infinite matroid-rooted digraphs

We prove a common generalization of the maximal independent arborescence packing theorem of Cs. Király [13] (which itself is a common generalization of the reachability based arborescence packing result [12] and a matroid based arborescence packing result [5]) and two of our earlier works about packing branchings in infinite digraphs, namely [9] and [11].

متن کامل

Infinite Circulant Digraphs and Random Infinite Circulant Digraphs

In this paper, we completely determine the connectivity of every infinite circulant digraphs and prove that almost all infinite circulant digraphs are infinitely strongly connected and therefore have both oneand two-way infinite Hamiltonian paths.

متن کامل

Packing Dicycle Covers in Planar Graphs with No K5-e Minor

We prove that the minimum weight of a dicycle is equal to the maximum number of disjoint dicycle covers, for every weighted digraph whose underlying graph is planar and does not have K5 − e as a minor (K5 − e is the complete graph on five vertices, minus one edge). Equality was previously known when forbidding K4 as a minor, while an infinite number of weighted digraphs show that planarity does...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of Graph Theory

دوره 83  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016